17 +years of experience assisting public corporations, private businesses and government
Specializes in indirect tax (GST) and employment taxes
Focuses on property and infrastructure, energy and resources, and government
Sydney
@alvarezmarsal
LinkedIn
Copied!
Nathan Hamilton is a Managing Director with Alvarez & Marsal Tax in Sydney and Brisbane. He specializes in indirect tax (GST) and employment taxes.
Mr. Hamilton brings more than 17 years of experience assisting public corporations, private businesses and government entities to manage all aspects of their GST and employment tax obligations. He has advised clients across all industries, with a particular focus on property and infrastructure, energy and resources, and government.
Mr. Hamilton’s recent engagements include a wage and superannuation remediation project for a large multinational organization, supporting a client and manage material tax exposure in respect of contractors ahead of M&A activity, and deploying technology to automate a client’s GST and payroll tax compliance processes.
Prior to joining A&M, Mr. Hamilton was a Tax Partner with KPMG.
Mr. Hamilton earned bachelor’s degrees in law and commerce from Griffith University. He is a Chartered Tax Advisor and a Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Queensland.
Explore A&M‘s analysis of latest developments in private equity taxation in Australia and discover what steps professionals can take to navigate these issues.
On 6 September 2024, the NSW Supreme Court ruled in favour of Uber in the case Uber Australia Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2024] NSWSC 1124.
Latest insightsThe latest insights from Nathan Hamilton's team
In many M&A share transactions, tax losses may represent significant hidden value. But that value depends particularly on two key questions: Can the tax losses survive the transaction and can the parties mutually agree on a business plan substantiating the future usage of the potentially surviving tax losses? Our article outlines how jurisdiction-specific rules — especially Germany’s strict change-in-ownership regime — affect the usability of tax losses post-closing, whether tax losses can provide a shelter for historic tax risks and why tax losses impact purchase price negotiations.
